<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Christopher T. Miller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctmiller.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctmiller.net</link>
	<description>observer :: storyteller :: technologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:21:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pinterest’s Absurd Terms of Service by Anthony aka BeanChef</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2012/02/pinterests-absurd-terms-of-service/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony aka BeanChef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=696#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Your assesment sounds spot on. The first bold paragraph is nothing more than a very weak &quot;COA&quot; clause, Cover Our Ass, so they can put a pretty site and make money from the reselling of other people&#039;s work. Because like you said, who is going to pin their own stuff up there. There is already a place for that kind of narcisism, it&#039;s called Twitter.
A friend who got in earlier than I said they were using it to organize all their creative ideas of how they want to decorate their apartment, what cool knitting projects they want to try in the future.  And while getting a bit tired of all the new social media sites I &quot;should be getting excited about&quot;, I thought that was a really good way to use it as I&#039;m just getting started in the whole knitting world and am craving all the ideas of where I can go as I feel confident.
BUT......then I read an article about the finer points and sticky widgets in the small fine print of the Pinterest TOS that hardly anyone reads and started having second thoughts. The article mentioned the two things written above, and  also said that while the publishing companies that might use the material and Pinterest are protected from any prosocution resulting from unauthorized use of this material, the user (ya know, the people the site was made for?) is NOT protected. So, I, the user, can be sued for using the site to do what it was designed to do by pinning different things that interest ME? Sure this isn&#039;t run by the same people trying to push SOPA/ACTA/&amp; that secret international way of getting around our rights? Because this is starting to sound a lot like entrapment.
I&#039;m still torn though because it looks like a lot of fun, but can&#039;t I do the same thing with a Bookmark folder on my own computer and then post the links to Twitter if I want to share. Because afterall, aren&#039;t they the thing that interest me? Why do I need an online service for that, or let everyone else know about it? If I have questions, or think  someone else might like it or have an answer to for  me, I should already know that person and be able to share with just them. It&#039;s called being social and having friends.
My Pinerest invite still sits in my email inbox -- UNopened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your assesment sounds spot on. The first bold paragraph is nothing more than a very weak “COA” clause, Cover Our Ass, so they can put a pretty site and make money from the reselling of other people’s work. Because like you said, who is going to pin their own stuff up there. There is already a place for that kind of narcisism, it’s called Twitter.</p>
<p>A friend who got in earlier than I said they were using it to organize all their creative ideas of how they want to decorate their apartment, what cool knitting projects they want to try in the future.  And while getting a bit tired of all the new social media sites I “should be getting excited about”, I thought that was a really good way to use it as I’m just getting started in the whole knitting world and am craving all the ideas of where I can go as I feel confident.</p>
<p>BUT.…..then I read an article about the finer points and sticky widgets in the small fine print of the Pinterest TOS that hardly anyone reads and started having second thoughts. The article mentioned the two things written above, and  also said that while the publishing companies that might use the material and Pinterest are protected from any prosocution resulting from unauthorized use of this material, the user (ya know, the people the site was made for?) is NOT protected. So, I, the user, can be sued for using the site to do what it was designed to do by pinning different things that interest ME? Sure this isn’t run by the same people trying to push SOPA/ACTA/&amp; that secret international way of getting around our rights? Because this is starting to sound a lot like entrapment.</p>
<p>I’m still torn though because it looks like a lot of fun, but can’t I do the same thing with a Bookmark folder on my own computer and then post the links to Twitter if I want to share. Because afterall, aren’t they the thing that interest me? Why do I need an online service for that, or let everyone else know about it? If I have questions, or think  someone else might like it or have an answer to for  me, I should already know that person and be able to share with just them. It’s called being social and having friends.</p>
<p>My Pinerest invite still sits in my email inbox — UNopened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let’s Discuss: Infosuicide by Ravensgrace</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/10/lets-discuss-infosuicide/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravensgrace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=304#comment-614</guid>
		<description>This incident vaguely reminds me of Lucas destroying all of the original prints of the Star Wars trilogy he could locate. So what if an author, such as Stephen King, should suddenly demand that libraries everywhere destroy every copy of their works? This is yet another reminder of the volatility of the Internet and of digital information in general, and a wake-up call that I need to locally mirror the resources that I use, and not simply expect them to be there for me when I wake up tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This incident vaguely reminds me of Lucas destroying all of the original prints of the Star Wars trilogy he could locate. So what if an author, such as Stephen King, should suddenly demand that libraries everywhere destroy every copy of their works? This is yet another reminder of the volatility of the Internet and of digital information in general, and a wake-up call that I need to locally mirror the resources that I use, and not simply expect them to be there for me when I wake up tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today’s Style by Jared</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2012/01/todays-style/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=598#comment-606</guid>
		<description>No apologies necessary, sir! Looking good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No apologies necessary, sir! Looking good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today’s Style by Arlene Radasky</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2012/01/todays-style/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene Radasky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=598#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Your wife is a lucky woman to have such a dashing gentleman offer your arm. Of course it is an offer to use your considerable magic and charm to keep the trolls at bay as you walk the uneven paths of the castle courtyard at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your wife is a lucky woman to have such a dashing gentleman offer your arm. Of course it is an offer to use your considerable magic and charm to keep the trolls at bay as you walk the uneven paths of the castle courtyard at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s Too Bad The NaNo Haters Are Right…Sort Of by Mur</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/11/its-too-bad-the-nano-haters-are-right-sort-of/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Mur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=527#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Somewhat belated to the party, but NaNo isn&#039;t the problem, it&#039;s the people. NaNo is like a laxative- it gets things moving, but if you took a laxative every month (er, day) it would do bad things to you. NaNo gets you going, but you have to, uh, keep eating fiber after that.
There&#039;s your poop metaphor for the day. You&#039;re welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat belated to the party, but NaNo isn’t the problem, it’s the people. NaNo is like a laxative– it gets things moving, but if you took a laxative every month (er, day) it would do bad things to you. NaNo gets you going, but you have to, uh, keep eating fiber after that.</p>
<p>There’s your poop metaphor for the day. You’re welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: The Gluten-Free Month by Chooch</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/report-the-gluten-free-month/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Chooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=550#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the follow-up. Very encouraging results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the follow-up. Very encouraging results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vim On Android — Update by Josh</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/06/vim-on-android-update/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/2011/06/vim-on-android---update#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the Terminal IDE project (https://market.android.com/details?id=com.spartacusrex.spartacuside)? I don&#039;t have an Android device (yet--preordered a certain one ;) so I can&#039;t comment on how well this app actually works, but I plan on trying it out soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the Terminal IDE project (<a href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.spartacusrex.spartacuside" rel="nofollow">https://market.android.com/details?id=com.spartacusrex.spartacuside</a>)? I don’t have an Android device (yet–preordered a certain one <img src='http://ctmiller.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  so I can’t comment on how well this app actually works, but I plan on trying it out soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Rob</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Clearly, anyone who opposes this provision is an America-hating terrorist. Enjoy your dog cages at Gitmo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, anyone who opposes this provision is an America-hating terrorist. Enjoy your dog cages at Gitmo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Scofflaws by Greg</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/digital-scofflaws/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=557#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Wow. Good stuff - going to have to listen to this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Good stuff — going to have to listen to this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Hal</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Section 1031 does pertain to US citizens as stated by Senator Levin, one of the bills sponsors.  Also, if you listened to the floor debate, it was made clear by responses from Senator Graham (SC), and Senator McCain (AZ) that the legislation would allow for the detention of US citizens apprehended on US soil and their indefinite (until the end of hostilities) detention without trial, as well as transfer to GITMO.  It also permits for their trial under the military tribunal system.  This is the Senate codifying an indefinite suspension of Habeus Corpus, which they have in their power to do as determined by the Supreme Court in ex parte Merryman (found that President Licoln&#039;s suspension during the civil war was unconstitutional as it was a power of congress).  It is also Congress codifying an option to use the military tribunal system to try US citizens apprehended in the US during GWOT (The Global War on Terror).  This is in contradiction to another Supreme Court decision, ex parte Milligan, which found that US citizens apprehended in states where functioning courts existed were not subject to the military tribunal system.  The Senators backing the legislation cite Quirin, another Supreme Court case, which permitted the use of the military tribunal system, but if the case is read the justices confined themselves to the specifics of the circumstances in that case, German belligerants who infiltrated the US clandestinely, without uniform.  The Hamdi case determined that a US citzens detained had the right to judicial review.  The intent of the legislation is clear, as stated by its proponents during floor debate - to permit the apprehension and detention of US citizens on US soil who are determined to be aiding or affiliated with Al Qaida and hold them until the end of hostilities without right to trial and, if tried, certainly not tried in the US court system.  Senator Graham stated the government already has this right, the legislation is simply codifying it.  That is not completely accurate.  Congress has not, until now, specifically legislated the suspension of Habeus Corpus indefinitely.  They also have not, until now, specifically opened the door to use of the military tribunal system for US citizens apprehended on US soil.  Again, this is expressly contrary to settled law, those being proponents of it citing Quirin in a broad interpretation of that decision and ignoring Milligan.  All said, I am equally surprised by the bi-partisan support of the legislation, which leads one to believe that what we do not know about home grown terrorism, its extent and danger, is known by Congress and is driving this support. The president has stated that he intends to veto this legislation.  I expect, and hope for, further debate where citizens who become more familiar with the issues weigh in by writing their representatives and expressing their views.  The White House also has a forum for citizens to express their views.  I would encourage all to do so.  It&#039;s high time we had an engaged public debate on these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 1031 does pertain to US citizens as stated by Senator Levin, one of the bills sponsors.  Also, if you listened to the floor debate, it was made clear by responses from Senator Graham (SC), and Senator McCain (AZ) that the legislation would allow for the detention of US citizens apprehended on US soil and their indefinite (until the end of hostilities) detention without trial, as well as transfer to GITMO.  It also permits for their trial under the military tribunal system.  This is the Senate codifying an indefinite suspension of Habeus Corpus, which they have in their power to do as determined by the Supreme Court in ex parte Merryman (found that President Licoln’s suspension during the civil war was unconstitutional as it was a power of congress).  It is also Congress codifying an option to use the military tribunal system to try US citizens apprehended in the US during GWOT (The Global War on Terror).  This is in contradiction to another Supreme Court decision, ex parte Milligan, which found that US citizens apprehended in states where functioning courts existed were not subject to the military tribunal system.  The Senators backing the legislation cite Quirin, another Supreme Court case, which permitted the use of the military tribunal system, but if the case is read the justices confined themselves to the specifics of the circumstances in that case, German belligerants who infiltrated the US clandestinely, without uniform.  The Hamdi case determined that a US citzens detained had the right to judicial review.  The intent of the legislation is clear, as stated by its proponents during floor debate — to permit the apprehension and detention of US citizens on US soil who are determined to be aiding or affiliated with Al Qaida and hold them until the end of hostilities without right to trial and, if tried, certainly not tried in the US court system.  Senator Graham stated the government already has this right, the legislation is simply codifying it.  That is not completely accurate.  Congress has not, until now, specifically legislated the suspension of Habeus Corpus indefinitely.  They also have not, until now, specifically opened the door to use of the military tribunal system for US citizens apprehended on US soil.  Again, this is expressly contrary to settled law, those being proponents of it citing Quirin in a broad interpretation of that decision and ignoring Milligan.  All said, I am equally surprised by the bi-partisan support of the legislation, which leads one to believe that what we do not know about home grown terrorism, its extent and danger, is known by Congress and is driving this support. The president has stated that he intends to veto this legislation.  I expect, and hope for, further debate where citizens who become more familiar with the issues weigh in by writing their representatives and expressing their views.  The White House also has a forum for citizens to express their views.  I would encourage all to do so.  It’s high time we had an engaged public debate on these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by celina</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>celina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I think the whole point of this is simply taking away our rights one at a time so we don&#039;t notice as much. I highly doubt Obama will veto this. One major thing about it is when rebellions start, there would legally be no help for rebels. Just slowly cut off the oxygen of freedom until we gasp for more air and gov&#039;t aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the whole point of this is simply taking away our rights one at a time so we don’t notice as much. I highly doubt Obama will veto this. One major thing about it is when rebellions start, there would legally be no help for rebels. Just slowly cut off the oxygen of freedom until we gasp for more air and gov’t aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Jim Etchison</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Etchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Section 1032(b)(1) and (b)(2):
&quot;The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 1032(b)(1) and (b)(2):</p>
<p>“The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the double post. Fat fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the double post. Fat fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-405</guid>
		<description>I’m still wrap­ping my head around it but at first glance the lan­guage of this arti­cle is inflam­ma­tory. That’s not to say the under­ly­ing asser­tions are wrong.
I am trou­bled by how bi-partisan that vote was, a sur­pris­ing num­ber of sen­a­tors from both sides sup­ported it.
My per­spec­tive from an ini­tial read­ing of some of the mate­r­ial is this is a very bad piece of leg­is­la­tion that opens up the poten­tial for Amer­i­can cit­i­zens to be arrested by the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary, on US soil with lit­tle to no recourse if this hap­pens. I am not sure what the cir­cum­stances are that would allow for that to hap­pen. Hope­fully some­one with a bet­ter head for the legalese, and more time, will be able to clar­ify and com­ment in more detail.
The one bright spot in all of this is the Pres­i­dent has promised to veto this if it ever makes it to his desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m still wrap­ping my head around it but at first glance the lan­guage of this arti­cle is inflam­ma­tory. That’s not to say the under­ly­ing asser­tions are wrong.</p>
<p>I am trou­bled by how bi-partisan that vote was, a sur­pris­ing num­ber of sen­a­tors from both sides sup­ported it.</p>
<p>My per­spec­tive from an ini­tial read­ing of some of the mate­r­ial is this is a very bad piece of leg­is­la­tion that opens up the poten­tial for Amer­i­can cit­i­zens to be arrested by the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary, on US soil with lit­tle to no recourse if this hap­pens. I am not sure what the cir­cum­stances are that would allow for that to hap­pen. Hope­fully some­one with a bet­ter head for the legalese, and more time, will be able to clar­ify and com­ment in more detail.</p>
<p>The one bright spot in all of this is the Pres­i­dent has promised to veto this if it ever makes it to his desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-404</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still wrapping my head around it but at first glance the language of this article is inflammatory. That&#039;s not to say the underlying assertions are wrong.
I am troubled by how bi-partisan that vote was, a surprising number of senators from both sides supported it.
My perspective from an initial reading of some of the material is this is a very bad piece of legislation that opens up the potential for American citizens to be arrested by the American military, on US soil with little to no recourse if this happens. I am not sure what the circumstances are that would allow for that to happen. Hopefully someone with a better head for the legalese, and more time, will be able to clarify and comment in more detail.
The one bright spot in all of this is the President has promised to veto this if it ever makes it to his desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m still wrapping my head around it but at first glance the language of this article is inflammatory. That’s not to say the underlying assertions are wrong. </p>
<p>I am troubled by how bi-partisan that vote was, a surprising number of senators from both sides supported it.</p>
<p>My perspective from an initial reading of some of the material is this is a very bad piece of legislation that opens up the potential for American citizens to be arrested by the American military, on US soil with little to no recourse if this happens. I am not sure what the circumstances are that would allow for that to happen. Hopefully someone with a better head for the legalese, and more time, will be able to clarify and comment in more detail.</p>
<p>The one bright spot in all of this is the President has promised to veto this if it ever makes it to his desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension of Habeas Corpus? by Greg</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/12/suspension-of-habeas-corpus/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=552#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got no info, but I&#039;m reposting this link in the hopes that discussion will yield answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got no info, but I’m reposting this link in the hopes that discussion will yield answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s Too Bad The NaNo Haters Are Right…Sort Of by Evo Terra</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/11/its-too-bad-the-nano-haters-are-right-sort-of/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Evo Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=527#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Hey, who are you calling a tool?
Oh... that would be me.
Guilty as charged.
Excellent rebuttal and points raised, Chris. You know me well enough to know I&#039;m not one to shy away from controversy. Jeff&#039;s post (and mine earlier) were supposed to get a reaction from people. Yours I liked. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, who are you calling a tool?</p>
<p>Oh… that would be me.</p>
<p>Guilty as charged. </p>
<p>Excellent rebuttal and points raised, Chris. You know me well enough to know I’m not one to shy away from controversy. Jeff’s post (and mine earlier) were supposed to get a reaction from people. Yours I liked. <img src='http://ctmiller.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50,239 by Veronica Giguere</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/11/50239/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica Giguere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=539#comment-395</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t WAIT to read your finished project, Chris.
You&#039;re absolutely right about using outlines. I started with a comic script that I&#039;d set aside, and using that as the guide made writing so much easier as the month went on. When I got stuck, I would scroll to the next part of the outline to see where I had planned to go, and the path always seemed clearer.
Editing is awesome. &quot;You can always edit when you finish the draft&quot; has been my reminder, since I should hit 50K by tomorrow and will not be finished with my own story. I did have to carve out some time to write, but the thrill of the wordcount made it worthwhile. I&#039;ll have to try this next year... although, the idea of Camp NaNoWriMo is awfully nifty.
... actually, Camp NaNoWriMo could be lots of fun, especially if one could plan to run the inkstained technowretch thong up the flagpole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t WAIT to read your finished project, Chris.</p>
<p>You’re absolutely right about using outlines. I started with a comic script that I’d set aside, and using that as the guide made writing so much easier as the month went on. When I got stuck, I would scroll to the next part of the outline to see where I had planned to go, and the path always seemed clearer.</p>
<p>Editing is awesome. “You can always edit when you finish the draft” has been my reminder, since I should hit 50K by tomorrow and will not be finished with my own story. I did have to carve out some time to write, but the thrill of the wordcount made it worthwhile. I’ll have to try this next year… although, the idea of Camp NaNoWriMo is awfully nifty.</p>
<p>… actually, Camp NaNoWriMo could be lots of fun, especially if one could plan to run the inkstained technowretch thong up the flagpole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50,239 by Allen Sale</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/11/50239/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=539#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Why I didn&#039;t participate in NaNoWriMo this year: I&#039;m more focused on getting things prepped for 2012 as well as juggling finding work, planning on editing audio for a short film, lining up interview contacts, and planning for a trip in December. The kicker is that on this trip I won&#039;t have internet access so I can knock out a short story or two or three; maybe more depending. And the way next year is shaping up, November could be busy with audio editing the first season of the anthology series I&#039;ll be righting from now until sometime in spring. Will there be a novel at some point? Sure. Writing the anthology series affords me the chance to work out a proper outline for where I want things to go and decide if the novel is the end all, be all. Or if it is the launching pad for a series of novels. Of course, this all depends on what else lines up since I&#039;m wanting to work with graphics artists, musicians, voice-over talent, people skilled with animation etc to produce a truly unique experience when all is set and done.
Congrats on reaching the first step in the relay race! Now comes the hand off; editing, revising, editing, rewriting, editing, submitting, publishing, and making that first sale. (Man, that&#039;s one intense race.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why I didn’t participate in NaNoWriMo this year: I’m more focused on getting things prepped for 2012 as well as juggling finding work, planning on editing audio for a short film, lining up interview contacts, and planning for a trip in December. The kicker is that on this trip I won’t have internet access so I can knock out a short story or two or three; maybe more depending. And the way next year is shaping up, November could be busy with audio editing the first season of the anthology series I’ll be righting from now until sometime in spring. Will there be a novel at some point? Sure. Writing the anthology series affords me the chance to work out a proper outline for where I want things to go and decide if the novel is the end all, be all. Or if it is the launching pad for a series of novels. Of course, this all depends on what else lines up since I’m wanting to work with graphics artists, musicians, voice-over talent, people skilled with animation etc to produce a truly unique experience when all is set and done.</p>
<p>Congrats on reaching the first step in the relay race! Now comes the hand off; editing, revising, editing, rewriting, editing, submitting, publishing, and making that first sale. (Man, that’s one intense race.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50,239 by Chris</title>
		<link>http://ctmiller.net/2011/11/50239/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctmiller.net/?p=539#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nathan! I like your thought of a production schedule. I find that I work far more efficiently with a structure, treating writing as *gasp* work. I think I shall steal this from you.
...and I want your point about not being able to edit an empty page engraved on a plaque to be hung on the wall above my workarea. Right next to the picture of J.C. Hutchins in his ink-stained technowretch thong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nathan! I like your thought of a production schedule. I find that I work far more efficiently with a structure, treating writing as *gasp* work. I think I shall steal this from you. </p>
<p>…and I want your point about not being able to edit an empty page engraved on a plaque to be hung on the wall above my workarea. Right next to the picture of J.C. Hutchins in his ink-stained technowretch thong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

