Pinterest’s Absurd Terms of Service
21 Feb
I started playing around with Pinterest today. I’d heard about the service from a few friends: the basic idea is that you create “boards” and you pin interesting things to them. It sounded to me like a very visual Del.icio.us with a little extra social to boot. I signed up.
Later in the day, after pinning a few things, some of it my work, some of it jstuff from around the web, Matt Perrin sent me to this article that explained the fine print in the Terms of Service:
As usual, the devil is in the details. Today, the ‘details’ are Pinterest operator Cold Brew Labs’ terms of service. And by ‘devil’ I mean the following two excerpts:
By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.
In the following paragraph, Pinterest asks me, the user, to affirm that, …
… you represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content, as contemplated under these Terms.
This bothers me on two levels. The first is obvious…I don’t want to give these guys permission to use or resell my work. Not without getting a cut.
The second part is the nonsensical nature of the terms when you consider the purpose of the service. The most common way to use Pinterest is not to pin your own work, but to pin someone else’s. Judging by the second bold paragraph, by pinning a site’s content, I am telling Cold Brew Labs that I own it, and that as the owner, I grant them the right to use. alter, sell, the work.
So…if I am reading this correctly, if I go to Chuck Wendig’s site, and I pin one of his essays using Pinterest, I’m stating that I own his essay and that I am going to let Cold Brew Labs use, sell, change it without Chuck’s permission and/or knowledge.
If I were Chuck, I’d totally kick my ass for such a thing. And I’d be right to do so.
Tell me I’m reading this wrong, will you? Tell me I’m in a froth over nothing. I certainly hope so. To think that there is such blatant stupidity in the world masquerading as a useful and somewhat fun website would almost, but not really, break my little heart.









Recent Comments